Preparatory Text 3
Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, amen. I have come to lament this project of writing. I am wondering if it has actual use or not. Whether the many teachings of God can be justified with reason or not. Whether we can actually know metaphysics or not. What can we know in this world? This is a troubling question. Yet I know, I know with certainty that I can know my experiences and my consciousness. This is something that I cannot doubt, but what is the meaning of my experiences?
I do not mean in a
moral sense only, but in every sense of the word “meaning”. Without a rational
ground of certainty, we have only a spiritual sense of truth, the idea that we
can recognize the truth simply by our nature and thus by a spiritual sense but
not by an absolute rational certainty. Yet, to recognize the limitations of
reason, we are obliged to use reason to identify its very limitations.
Therefore we reach a stalemate. If we claim that reason is incompetent by using
reason, then we have defeated ourselves. Yet we must always reason, otherwise
we are engaging in blind faith.
This is why I once
wrote of the idea of sufficient reasoning. Sufficient reasoning means that
there are times or perhaps everytime where absolute certainty is impossible.
Instead there is reasoning which is sufficient to demonstrate that something is
not contradictory to reason and then we put our trust in that object, that is
called reasonable trust or when applied to God, it is reasonable faith. Because
our human intellect or reason cannot reach full certainty about anything, only
God has that or perhaps our glorified intellect in union with God. So we must
put our faith in God as He reveals Himself through the Catholic Church.
Now my good friends,
this really is a matter of acceptance. I either accept what I understand as
being sufficient, or I seek deeper and deeper understanding until I reach the
fullness of understanding as possible through my human intellect with the aid
of God. If I seek to accept the way of faith, then I must abandon any further
attempts to justify any doctrine of God, but if I seek to accept the way of
understanding, then I must understand all of my choices, that is in effect,
prove them with utmost rigor and rationality as satisfactory to my intellect. So,
me, what is my choice?
It is decided, I shall
choose the path of understanding. And so my God, I ask of You the grace of
understanding so I can understand You better and love You more. So, the
argument for Your Existence is sufficient. There is an indirect proof of Your
Intellect and Your Knowledge, but I am seeking a deeper more direct proof of
Your Omniscience. Wait before that, I must understand why I seek understanding.
I seek understanding because I believe that certainty is required for a faith
to be truly authentic. Because if we trust in God without any certainty or
reason, how can we know whether the object of our trust is truly God or not?
For we seek to
maximize the probability of us attaining God, without any certainty or rational
evidence of God, then it would be a gamble of choosing which religion and
revelation is authentically of God. Yet this presupposes everything about
probability and reality, and that is just too much for my small brain. So, let
us try again, from the beginning. This time, this system will be published only
in my texts, and so anyone will encounter this system only from my texts and
not from my speech. This is the system of reason, as far as God exists and as
far as He reveals to our intellect on what is true and what exists.
God and Awareness
The indirect proof of
God being Infinite Awareness and thus Infinite Intellect and Knowledge is that
since the Infinite Existence includes all things, then as something of
consciousness and experience is definite in existence, then the Infinite
Existence must include Infinite Consciousness and Experience and so this unites
Existence and Consciousness under God or under the single name of Existence. However,
again, this is the same problem with regular finite objects such as dogs and cars.
These things are included within the Infinite Existence, yet they cannot be
claimed to be equivalent to the Infinite Existence.
Therefore, we must
reason to God’s Intellect from another way. This way is to investigate the
nature of consciousness as much as possible and also understand the core
distinction between conscious beings and unconscious beings, if there is such a
thing as an unconscious being. There are 2 marks of consciousness, the
subjective mark and the objective mark. The subjective mark of consciousness is
that subjective experience of being conscious and experiencing reality. The
objective mark of consciousness is the attribution of the property of existence
to consciousness and experience, thus establishing them as real objects of
existence instead of simply being objects of the mind.
Therefore, the
question of other minds and other consciousness is not a subjective problem,
rather an objective problem of whether other beings possess the objects of
consciousness and experience or not. Now if the objects of consciousness
possess no tangible effect to other objects of consciousness, then it is
impossible to prove that other objects of consciousness exist. So for anything
to be proven to exist in contingency outside of God, they must have a tangible effect
on our consciousness, such that they are proven to exist. Yet for God, He is
everything that is possible. The Infinite Existence includes all possibilities
and thus it is impossible for God to possibly be conscious and lack it.
Therefore, by this understanding, God necessarily possess infinite
consciousness and knowledge. I see this as a sufficiently direct proof of the
consciousness and knowledge of God.
The Relationship
between Existence and Consciousness
For within God there
is a simple union of all things, including between Existence and Consciousness,
we must then ascribe to all things this simple union of natures, between
existence and consciousness. What is the implication of a union for the process
of consciousness identifying objects? We may say that while all objects are
fundamentally consciousness, there are special kinds of consciousness which
possess a constancy in nature, a centrality to itself and then an intellect,
this is the soul. As souls are special kinds of consciousness, then there is
the highest kind of souls, that is the human soul, which is described fittingly
as a rational and immortal soul.
As such, let us
distinguish between various kinds of consciousness. The first kind of
consciousness is the simple consciousness. They are of course composite
relative to God, yet simple relative to other kinds of consciousness. The chief
example I shall use of this consciousness is a rock. The rock is a rock by
existence, but by existence it is actually the total consciousness of the rock.
What is the total consciousness of the rock? It is every experience of the rock
from every perspective and every distance and every relationship the rock has. Therefore,
it is the experience of every detail of the rock and everything in it.
Comments
Post a Comment