How to do Philosophy (Intro to Philosophy Coursera Week 1)
Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, amen. A continuation of the commentary on Week 1 of Introduction to Philosophy from Coursera. How do we practice philosophy? Classically, we say that philosophy is done by argumentation. Arguments are basically just a set of statements which are divided into the reasons for our belief or premises, and the belief we are trying to reason that is a conclusion.
The idea of arguments
are presuppositional in my understanding of the matter. When I do philosophy, I
do argue, but I don’t make my arguments explicit as in a proper form of
premises and conclusions. I simply state the reason behind my beliefs and let
it be in that kind of writing. It is certainly a raw and crude way of
philosophy, which I desire to improve in the future. When I say arguments are
presuppositional, I mean that the argumentative method is so utterly
fundamental to philosophy that there is really no other way around it. You
either provide a reason to your beliefs, or you don’t. Without reason, all
beliefs are arbitrary and truth is impossible to attain. Yet such is not the
case, therefore we must have reason.
What is reason though?
Reason is simply the fulfillment of the truth of a particular matter. What I
mean by this is that if such and such is true, what makes it true? What element
or component of that idea or matter which determines it to be true? In my own
system, I would say it this way. In what way is the idea or belief identical to
the categorical criterion or criteria of truth such that we can say that the
belief belongs within the category we call truth? That is the foundation of the
idea of arguments, that all true beliefs and ideas have a property which
fulfills the categorical criteria of being truth. This property is what we call
reason or premise.
For an argument to be
valid, the reason for the belief has to actually support the belief. That is,
if the reason for the truth of the belief is true, then the belief must be
true. However, for an argument to be sound, that is valid and the belief is
actually true, then the reasons or premises have to be true as well. So from
this description we can infer that beliefs can be supported by other beliefs. We
believe something is true because we believe another thing is true. There is
another way we can believe in something, that is to say we believe because we
have “seen”. To “see” here simply means that we have direct contact with the
object of our belief such that we can immediately believe in that object
without needing mediation from other beliefs.
This is an additional
comment about the mechanism of reasoning by other belief. When we base our
beliefs on other beliefs, we recognize that all beliefs are founded in another
belief. Even the fundamental belief of awareness comes from itself, it is a self-evident
belief. Now beliefs create a system of beliefs which are in general patterns of
reality. When we see into reality and try to ascertain how a part of reality
fits into our belief system, we observe how it coheres into the patterns. As
such, philosophy can be said to be largely about discovering patterns and
applying those patterns where applicable. It is to discover an order, a law so
to speak. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it
was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, amen.
Comments
Post a Comment